In other words, one cannot simply draw conclusion on sound quality based on raw bit rates and compression figures alone it also depends on how well designed are the encoding and decoding algorithms. In this Dolby vs DTS debate, DTS people argue that they are after 'sonic perfection, not space consumption' - hence the higher bit rate and lower compression.ĭolby would counteract that their codec is more efficient and therefore, it can run at a lower bit rate. A higher bit-rate for the same format should normally implies superior sound during playback, as less compression in the encoding process should result in a better representation of the original sound source. We are dealing with lossy compression techniques. Partly, this reasoning arises because DTS surround sound is usually encoded at a higher data rate than Dolby Digital and its lineup of associated formats.
![get back up again trolls mp3 get back up again trolls mp3](https://speakerform.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/PCM-vs-Dolby-Digital.jpg)
Many audiophiles and home theater enthusiasts argue that DTS surround sound formats can deliver higher quality audio in comparison to their corresponding Dolby formats, with improved dynamic range, better representation of subtle detail in audio content, and improved signal-to-noise ratio. This Dolby vs DTS surround sound is a rather hotly debated issue.
![get back up again trolls mp3 get back up again trolls mp3](https://www.soundandvision.com/images/styles/600_wide/public/120803-TXSR608Display.jpg)
Dolby Digital and DTS Digital Surround Sound - Identifying the main differences between these multi-channel sound formats